I think the martial arts are great----I enjoy the ones I do, I like the
ones I see, and I think that just about every single martial art out there
has at least SOME very good things about it----if not a LOT of good
things about it.
However, in this section, we are talking about martial arts for
self-defense purposes, which is a very specialized thing---and
not all martial arts have strengths in this area.
Now, in general, all martial arts will help you prepare to defend
yourself, at least indirectly---you will be in better shape, more
flexible, more able to withstand punishment, and have more control over
your body. These are all good things.
However, being a football player will do much the same things. To me,
for a martial art to be a good self-defense art, it needs to do several
things:
- It must directly teach you simple, efficient ways of dealing with
common attacks.
- It needs to prepare you for eventualities---meaning in class, you
need to deal with the fact that in self-defense, no matter what you do,
there is a chance (sometimes, a GOOD chance) that you are going to get
hurt.
- It needs to teach you when to react, when NOT to react, and when to
attempt to de-escalate. (Some people might jump on me here---but
seriously folks, sometimes it is a complete waste of time to attempt to
de-escalate.)
- MOST IMPORTANTLY, it needs to teach you the correct mindset
to stand up for youself, be in control of yourself, and to have the
self-confidence to know you are worth defending----which allows you to do so.
- Also, (personal bias) since most people who wish to learn
self-defense will not stay in the martial art for years and years, my
opinion is that the art should immediately start teaching basic
self-defense, in the first few weeks of class. (If you are going to
advertise yourself at a self-defense course, then students should start
learning that----as opposed to waiting to add the self-defense curriculum
until the student is "firmly grounded in the basics" about 2 years down
the line.
I love Aikido, and think that Tai Chi is wonderful. However, are they
good self-defense arts, in my opinion, according to the criteria above?
Not really.
If you have taken Aikido or Tai Chi for 10 years, and practiced
diligently, concientiously, and continually, and thought about what you
are doing with regards to self-defense, there is a fairly good chance
that you will be just about untouchable.
On the other hand, after one year? No. The way those arts are taught,
the general mindset of the art and the things those arts emphasize do
not teach self-defense----at least, not right away.
And most people can't wait 10 years to learn to defend themselves. I
highly recommend both Aikido and Tai Chi---there are some VERY important
things you can learn from them. However, immediate self-defense is not
one of them.
Things to check
When attempting to find a martial art that teaches self-defense, there
are a couple of simple things to look for. Each martial art is
different, and moreover, each instructor teaches their martial art
differently----so WTF Taekwondo at one place might be completely
different than WTF TKD at another. You just have to go take a look.
Attend a class---take a look. What do you see happening?
- Are people practicing practical self-defense?
- Are people practicing reactions to common self-defense situations?
Or are they doing rote forms, practicing flying spin kicks, or using
archaic weapons that you could never carry on the street? (Remember,
your point here is self-defense----you are not looking for
instructions on how to use a halberd. If the art teaches that as well,
fine, but that is not the primary goal of your search.)
- Are the lower belts practicing simple, efficient ways to deal with
attackers?
- Or is it just the higher belts who are working on self-defense? Yes,
all beginners need to work on basics---however, you should ALSO see them
working self-defense techniques. After all, if you join, that is where
you are going to be---and you are here to learn to defend yourself.
- Is the instructor teaching a mindset in addition to the moves?
- Can you see the instructor making sure the students are understanding
that they aren't learning to beat up on people, they are learning to stop
people from hurting them----and that it is ok to do whatever is necessary
to accomplish that? (I'm not talking only about being able to seriously
damage someone here---I'm also talking about the other end of the
spectrum, so that people who are being harrassed, manhandled, etc---but
not directly VIOLENTLY attacked, know
how to deal with the situation-----and are building the self-confidence
to do so.)
- Optional, but a good idea: Does the martial art (and the instructor)
teach self-defense reactions in a way that makes sense to you?
- Meaning, the way that particular martial art reacts to an
attack----does that fit the way your mind works? Do the reactions
make intuitive sense to you, in the style in which they work? Does it fit
the physical limitations of your body? Example: 1) a very tiny person
might become VERY good at judo---but won't be able to do much in the way of
self-defense in only a year. Size can make a difference.
Ok, enough babbling. I have some suggestions for places to check out--at
least to start your search. They are
here
Also, look in the General
Martial Arts links for the Newbie Guide and
the rec.martial-arts FAQ which are both VERY helpful to
people looking for martial arts for specific reasons.
Ah, NO. Sorry. It is true in a way, but not really.
(Hmm. Let's explain that a little more clearly.)
Size and strength don't matter------true, yes, provided:
Provided you take your martial art, practice it diligently and
accurately, for an extended time. Provided you understand the difference
between street situations and class situations, self-defense and point
sparring, and provided you learn the self-defense mindset.
If that is true, than yes-----when you are a 4th or 5th degree black
belt, it won't matter how big your opponent is, really. (Unless they
ALSO are a 5th degree. Then it might matter, but not necessarily.)
And yes, for certain techniques it doesn't matter how big or
strong the other person is. Poke them in the eye, jab them in the
throat, lock back the knee, etc---size won't matter. So people aren't
lying when they tell you size doesn't matter.
Not necessarily.
But don't believe it never matters.
When you are just starting out, it matters. When
you've only been doing it awhile, it matters. When you are sparring
people in your martial arts class, it matters.
I wish it wasn't true, (since I'm 5'8" and 140 pounds) but a big guy (or
girl) has a definite advantage in most fights. That's simply how it is.
If you take two people who have been taking the same martial art for
about 6 monthes, and put them in a fight, MOST LIKELY, the bigger guy is
going to win. You put a 6'4", 220 pound street thug up against a 5'2",
110 pound female yellow belt in a streetfight, the guy has the advantage.
Obviously.
Though that doesn't mean he is going to win.
A good big guy, in general, will beat a good small guy [grumble] up to a
certain point of experience and knowledge. Beneath five years (and
actually way beyond that, but I don't want to disenhearten you too much)
size makes a difference.
Size does matter---and so you have to adjust your techniqes to your
situation. If I'm fighting against a guy twice my strength and size, I'm
NOT going to try punching him in the chest. (Which I really wouldn't do
anyway, it's fairly useless, though it looks cool in movies.) I'm also
definitely NOT going to stand there and attempt to trade punches with
him. I'm not going to use strength moves, I'll use soft tissue
techniques (no matter how strong you are, your muscles will NOT cover the
trachea) and I will NOT close with him until I have him stunned or off
balance, because if he grabs me, I'm in trouble. (Not dead, not yet, but
if he's that much stronger, even if he's an idiot, he can do serious damage.)
A small person can defend themself against a big person. But it's an
uphill battle, make no mistake. The trick to winning is fairly simple:
Be smarter, and be nasty.
A big person (mostly, but not all) has relied on their size to get
by----most people don't need much more than that to win, especially the
type of person who would attack you on the street. And since you can't
beat them at size, you have to beat them at BRAINS.
Because if you don't, you'll get killed.
In martial arts, it ISN'T about size or strength----it's about using your
brain to make your body do what you tell it to, effectively. In
self-defense, the application of martial arts is simple:
Do what is necessary to keep yourself from being hurt.
What that means against bigger people is simple----you are probably going
to have to upgrade the seriousness of your techniques, and go for soft
tissue (fairly damaging) targets instead of simple disables. Because
your margin for error just went down----a big guy hits harder than a
small guy.
So the ending conclusion? In time, size won't really matter. But no
matter what, you must still keep it in mind, because even if it doesn't
matter, it still makes a difference. (And in the
beginning, it matters, too. [sigh])
A number of people have written me and asked about using various articles
and such from my page---you are welcome to do so. I hope they are of use
to you, and that they make you think.
If you are going to use any of these articles for a class, paper,
discussion group, etc, please think about contributing to the Nebraska
Hapido Association Training Fund. Right now we are working on putting
together a padded attacker suit, and everything you give in return for
using my articles will go towards that.